Film Review: Michigan at Michigan State, 2021, Part 1

By -

I breakdown interesting plays - schematically, technically, and from and execution standpoint - from the 2021 Michigan at Michigan State football game.

Two parts, due to the length. Part 2 here.

First includes some thoughts.

Michigan Offense

  • I felt like Michigan came out with a really good game plan offensively and it showed. On the ground, they started with a lot of counter plays which were very close to breaking if they were just able to complete the margins. In the air, they dominated by attacking the LB level with the TE, RB, and crossers that achieved inside leverage vs MSU's Cover 1. They mostly forced MSU to abandon their standard passing down package as well. Even in the red zone, they recongnized: 1) they had issues finishing when the field got compressed; 2) MSU was great at preventing red zone TDs. Because of that, around the 15-25 yard line, they took shots several times, they pulled out some trick plays and tendency breakers, etc. While it didn't consistently work, they did exactly what they should have from a play calling standpoint. I think anyone that tries to claim that this wasn't a very good offensive gameplan is missing a lot of what is actually happening. This was a very good game plan.
Michigan Defense
  • I believe going into the game, the expectation was a low scoring game (winner in the 20s), and that impacted Michigan's gameplan. Michigan came out with a lot of 1 ILB formations because they felt MSU could not win one-on-one blocks. On a down-to-down basis, that was correct, and allowed safeties to help over the top of WRs. But it allowed Walker room to work once he got through the 1st level, and in that way, it backfired in a major way. Michigan is clearly much more comfortable in their 2-4 package, with at least 2 ILBs, and the stats will show that. But I think from a gameplan perspective, they didn't feel they would force enough stops and field position wins. In retrospect, obviously that was wrong.
Michigan State Offense
  • The Michigan State offense found ways to step up at the most critical junctures. You can point to the OTs getting beat up, especially in the ground game. But they managed to avoid many straight drop backs and protect them, and when high leverage plays were needed, MSU found them. Walker is getting the headlines, and he had a great game in terms of contact balance, setting up cut backs, etc. But I think it's actually Reed who is more responsible for getting MSU back in the game, with four or five major plays. But it trickled throughout the offense, and when a big play was needed, they found a way to pay off big play calls.
Michigan State Defense
  • The Spartans had a big game from a player at each level of defense. Slade was dominant. He gave Michigan's young LG a ton of trouble in this game, and when asked to handle him alone, the Center was no match either. Barrow also continues to flash. He's a RS FR, and sometimes it shows, but his upside is really big. At LB, while Michigan could pick on Crouch a bit, Halladay had a great game, showed great instincts with angles from the backside (or which Michigan regularly tried to keep him on) and leaked very, very few yards. And then of course, Henderson continues to make plays from the secondary. In crunch time, some little seen faces also made plays to seal the victory.

 Overall

  • These are two clearly very closely matched teams. While the high scoring nature was not what I was expecting, the gameplans (outside the 6-1) largely was. And they worked. At the end of the day, Michigan finished with about 150 more yards, had plenty of good field position from punt returns, but stalled too many times in the red zone, where Michigan State really takes advantage of the shorter field to prevent TDs. But at the end of the day, when it came time to win the 50-50 plays, or the 30-70 plays, or whenever the high leverage situation arose, the Spartans did. Michigan felt like they had about 10 opportunities to put the game away, but couldn't find that last play. That can be hard to stomach, but it felt like two good teams (in a bit of a down year overall outside the top few teams, these being two top 10 teams isn't unreasonable) that traded punches, and the clock ran out.
  • As I did say on twitter, I think both teams showed a lot of heart. And while people hate the idea of moral victories, I thought Michigan came out loose, made some plays, and didn't back down. Michigan State obviously came off the mat twice and won, but twice Michigan could have felt they let the win go away, only for in both instances march right down the field and take back the lead (and the second time, quickly get a 3 and out on D). The players showed up, the coaches showed up, neither team should leave this game thinking they don't still have a lot to play for.
Key Article for this Game

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Football Fundamentals: Twins Passing Concepts

By -
Image
In this post we will look at some of the standard route concepts run from a twins alignment. Obviously, these can be paired with other routes (some I'll show including a RB), but this is to get the fundamental understanding of the routes. I'll try to explain the concept briefly, as well as provide names for what you'll hear the concept called elsewhere at times (these things get lots of names, some people use the same names but have different meanings too, so it can get confusing). If a number is visible near the end of a route, that is the nominal yardage the route will be run to. For more information on specific routes, we took a look at the  route tree earlier . In this article I will not discuss routes that utilize rub concepts close to the LOS (such as a switch concept). I will have a later article dedicated to rub routes from a Twins set. Many of these are similar to the TE-Flanker Concepts discussed earlier.
Read more

Football Fundamentals: 2x2 and Mirrored Passing Concepts

By -
Image
We are going to continue our look at various passing concepts, this time with 2x2 and mirrored passing concepts. In this post we are going to trim out the concepts that are designed to attack the middle of the field and put those into a separate post. 2x2 concepts allow an offense to attack a defense based on post-snap looks and coverages via a simple read of the safety. Completely mirrored concepts, when the same concept is run on the both sides of the formation (such as all-hitches), is something of which I'm not a huge fan, but there are advantages to it. You look at something like all-hitches, which overloads underneath zones, and you see a viable option in the short passing game against zone heavy teams; similarly, completely mirrored concepts can allow you to pick on certain defenders or to a certain side of the field based on defensive look. We'll also look at "base" concepts, which see the outside receivers run the same route, and a third receiver work the mid
Read more

Football Fundamentals: The Tite Front Defense

By -
Image
The defense du jour against modern spread attacks is what is commonly known as the “Tite” front. Over the past couple years, you’ve seen Big 12 teams run it increasingly often, and SEC and other teams start to incorporate variants of the look more often as well as they begin to deal with an increasing number of spread formations. But what exactly is the “Tite” front? Like any front, say, a 4-3 Under, it isn’t necessarily any one thing. You can have single-high, two-high, or even three-high safeties. You can attach your overhangs differently. And with Tite, it may even mean different box numbers. And of course, there are multiple techniques that can be employed along the way. This post is a primer to the Tite front. At the end, I’ll link some of the better articles that get into greater depth for those interested, but for now, we need to understand the basics, so that we can understand how to attack it.
Read more