Inside the Playbook - MSU's Switch Concept
Previously I talked about how MSU offensive coordinator Dave
Warner simplified the passing game with easy to read pass concepts for the then
inexperienced Connor Cook. In this post, we’re going to look how MSU progressed
their playbook, so that later in the year, Cook was trusted to make more
advanced reads, and so defenses had a harder time stopping the Spartan’s
offense. In this article, we’ll specifically look at MSU’s use of the switch
concept.
The Switch Concept
During the second half of the season, perhaps the go to play
for MSU on third downs was what is known as the “switch” concept. Dating back
to the run and shoot, the switch concept has been a bit simplified, but still
relies on one of the core tenets of the run in shoot, albeit to a lesser
degree: it is adaptable mid-play via simultaneous reads from the WRs and QBs.
Now the switch concept is a staple across college and NFL teams because of its
adaptability and relative ease to run.
The Play
The switch concept is a two-man route combination that works
to both attack the field vertically against both zone and man concepts. What we’ll
describe here will utilize two WRs, but this play can also be run with a WR and
a TE, for instance. Most likely the offense will utilize at least a 6-man
protection scheme here, if not a 7-man protection, but the backside routes should
provide a hot option, as the front side switch concept requires a deep drop and
time to work, and should work to maintain the backend of the defense to prevent
them from sliding over the top.
Read on after the jump.
Read on after the jump.
Position Reads
Outside Receiver
The outside receiver will work to get an inside release,
stemming his route at the outside shoulder of the man covering the slot. It is
important that while he runs, he continue to press vertical against the man
initially over top of him. This forces that CB to maintain contact with him in
man (rather than allowing for a in/out match up with the inside defender) and
creates a wall of sorts. Just as important, it prevents the defender from
gaining inside position on him, giving the receiver the ability to run his
inside cutting routes depending on the safety coverage.
That is where the play starts becoming adaptable. The outside
receiver’s route is dependent on the position of the safeties. Just as QBs
often read safeties at the snap, so will the WR. This idea is termed “Middle of
Field Open” (MOFO) or “Middle of Field Closed”, meaning there is defense is in
a two-high safety look and the middle of the field is clear grass or that it is
a single-high safety defense and the middle of the field is occupied, but the seam
is open. Additional adaptability can be had when facing a man coverage, as
noted in the figure above with “MOFC-Man”.
Inside Receiver
The inside receiver will try to press vertically at the
snap, but if he’s given a clean release outside only, he’ll take it. They key
is that he must rub underneath the outside receiver stemming inside. Pressing
vertically allows the outside receiver a better chance of getting even with the
defender over the slot. Regardless, the inside receiver will have an outside
release underneath the outside receiver, where he will work briefly toward the
sideline before wheeling up.
He also has a couple simple reads: if there is a man in
front of him, playing the deep third to the sideline, he’ll check up at 10-12
yards in the void between the flat and deep third defender. If there isn’t a
man in that deep third zone, he’ll press vertically and work his route based on
the defender matched up with him. If the defender is even or behind the
receiver, he’ll continue to run his wheel down the sideline like a Go or Fade
route. If the defender that has him in man gets over top of him, the receiver
will run a comeback route or a back-shoulder fade toward the sideline.
QB Reads
The QB has a fairly simple progression read, the main
difficulty, and the advanced aspect of this route, is that the QB needs to be
on the same page as the receiver, both in terms of where they’ll take their
routes, but also the depth and timing.
Against a single-high safety he will read the safety movement
and throw away from him, progressing from the outside receiver running the
post-seam-dig route to the inside receiver running the wheel-comeback route.
Lastly he’ll look to dump the ball off late. In case of immediate pressure, he
should have a hot.
Running the Play
First let’s look at a standard cover 3, in which the MOFC. The
outside receiver will work the seam while the outside receiver will run a
comeback.
If MOFO, the #1 will run to open grass. In this case, he
first will see the playside safety working toward his half of the field. He
then needs to find the other safety to make sure he isn’t cheating over the top,
either to work toward the switch concept or in a cover 5 look. Well get to that
momentarily. If the middle of the field is open, say in a standard cover 2, the
#1 WR will run a post, breaking at about the 12 yard mark. The #2 will continue
on his wheel.
If the opposite safety is cheating over, then the middle of
the field is closed, and the outside receiver will square his route and work
over the middle of the field at about 12 yards. The seam in this instance is
less favorable because the momentum of the far safety carries him towards the
seam, and the position of the near safety puts the defender in a good spot to
defend the seam.
This will also be the route if he feels the CB cheating too
far over the top of him to prevent the receiver from maintaining proper
position against his defender. Typically, the CB will only be capable of doing
that if he has ample help inside and over the top. That means there is a
single-high safety, or in other terms, MOFC-Man. Here it is important that the
receiver gets the CB to turn up field by pushing hard vertically before
breaking inside on his dig. In this case, let’s assume that the rub is successful
and that the inside defender is in a recovery position on the wheel.
Video
Here is MSU running the switch concept against a cover 1 in
their first drive of the B1G championship game. Here OSU is sending the blitz
and running man-free behind it. Note how #1 pushes the seam hard, while the #2
maintains good spacing from the sideline. The defender being in poor position,
is unable to get his head turned to locate the football and commits pass
interference.
Here is MSU running the switch concept later that same drive
against a cover 4. Note how the defender initially over the slot stays with him
and initially maintains outside leverage at the snap (because he has help over
the top and inside from the safety). You see the safety initially break for the
#2 before realizing the #1 is coming back inside. He picks him up late, but not
before Cook sees his opening outside. In this case, MSU is running a switch concept on both sides, but the backside (with the TE) is more delayed, providing a built in "hot" with the TE.
Note that the rub is not very successful here because the #1
doesn’t work inside well enough (he’s trying to get the CB to work vertically
probably a bit too much), but the defender over the slot stays over top of the
#2, so #2 runs the comeback. Likely, this was something MSU saw on film and
knew how they wanted to attack this look pre-snap, and therefore adjusted their
routes somewhat accordingly, though the options still exist. This is likely a designed roll out for Cook, but note on the backside that MSU is running a standard double slant, which provides a hot if edge pressure from the roll side is evident pre-snap or some other "hot" read is made.
Conclusion
So here’s an example of MSU running a concept that required
improvement not only from the QB, but also from the WRs. Both position groups
struggled for the Spartans in 2012, but the steady progression over the 2013
season, combined with the improved protection to allow for such concepts, was a
significant reason why Michigan State were B1G champions.
In the next piece we will look more closely at how Cook
advanced in his ability to read defenses, looking at a play that utilizes two
standard pass concepts, and allows Cook to read his “alert”, or otherwise
one-high or two-high safeties.
Etc
Smart Football (June Jones, Hawaii, SMU), Jim Light (Seahawks), Subway Domer and Her Loyal Sons (ND), Grantland (Giants)
Etc
Smart Football (June Jones, Hawaii, SMU), Jim Light (Seahawks), Subway Domer and Her Loyal Sons (ND), Grantland (Giants)
Great stuff. In the first video, it looks like the corner has Kings over the top if he just looks for the ball - should Kings have peeled back there?
ReplyDeleteFrom my relatively untrained eye it seemed like Kings gained favor early in the season because he could just catch the ball, but he got left behind by Fowler and Lippett who made great strides as the season went along.
Yes. The phrase that is often used is "He's even, I'm leavin'" (meaning continuing the wheel) and "He's goin', I'm stayin'" (meaning you come back).
DeleteTo me, the OSU defender is over top of Kings rather than even with him. It's hard to tell with the angles of the camera, but I think Cook is attempting to throw a back shoulder fade here. The fact that OSU's defender interferes slows Kings down and makes it look like the ball is thrown in front.
As for Kings, I think he's doing the correct thing as well. My guess is that the receiver is taught to peel back vs a cover 3 situation where a defender is clearly over the top. But against man, they are supposed to press the route vertical to keep the defender from breaking on the route. Likely a man vs zone adjustment on the peel back.
That is the receiver is taught to press vertical but expect the throw to be made to his back shoulder, essentially carrying the defender deep and peeling back at the last second, rather than running a come back route as he would vs cover 3.
DeleteAh that all makes sense. Sounds like a very slight wrinkle with the back shoulder throw.
Delete