Previously, we discussed how Michigan and teams like MSU are playing pulling blockers. They key in both schemes can be boiled down to taking away the numbers advantage the offense is trying to gain at the point of attack. This is down by flowing across the formation by a backside LB or by inserting safeties into the run fills. As teams start keying pulling OL, they begin diagnosing plays faster and taking away the offense's advantage. That's where the offense can begin doing things to take away those keys or use the pull as a false key. Let's look at how Michigan's playbook handles this.
Patrick Semansky / AP
Don't Pull
Let's start with the simple task of not pulling a player. This provides one fewer key for the defense. Now, that seems simple, sure, run a zone or iso or a lead play and there isn't the pulling key. But what if you want to maintain the numbers advantage provided by a pulling blocker but you don't want to provide the key? That's where inserting multiple backs into the action can help.
Here, Michigan runs something that I call "Power F". Essentially, the FB acts as the pulling guard as the H-back acts as the kick out block (note the gaps formed below are the same gaps that are formed with a power play.
Note that on this play, the playside LB takes a false step then attacks the "pulling blocker" with the wrong shoulder, opening up a crease in the defense. Similarly, the backside LB gets caught up instead of getting across the formation.
Fold Block
Here's something that is criminally underutilized in modern football: the fold block. In fact, I haven't yet seen Harbaugh utilize this tactic, but I want to talk about it because it's something that I really love. The fold block is used to improve blocking angles for the OL while allowing an OL to be a lead blocker similar to a FB. If you have a OL with good feet, this can be deadly. You can also use it as a counter to the Power play.
Here, instead of attacking the "frontside" LB, the pulling blocker will actually be looking to attack the backside LB and the frontside takes himself out of the play. I've shown it below both against an Over and Under front (notice that the blocker changes from the backside guard to the center, which can sometimes be difficult for the center when the QB is under center, so the RB needs to allow the play to develop before getting down hill).
This play is perhaps even better served by a team that runs a lot of open side (weakside) Power, as seen in the next two diagrams.
You can also run this like a "G" play, with either the FB or RB (though that is a frontside pull)
While not Michigan, here's former Toledo coach (now Iowa State coach) Matt Campbell running a Center fold with what could be a read option on the backside of the play (both open and closed side)
Influence Whams
A reemerging scheme in today's football is the "Wham" block. What hasn't yet reemerged with most teams is influence traps and whams. An influence trap cause the frontside of the defense to overplay the outside run, but the backside pulling blocker will still provide the backside players that "pull" key. So we'll save that, and focus instead on the influence wham play.
Here, you pull two OL, one gives a false "frontside" key, the other a false backside key, and forces the defense to react opposite where the play is actually going. The H-back then cleans up the defender covering one of the pulling guards. Not only is the DL flowing the wrong direction trying to squeeze out the pullers hole, but the LBs begin flowing the wrong way as well.
Pull a Guard - Cut Back
Of course, there is always the option of stressing the cutback to the RB if the backside is overpursuing. If the backside LB is getting himself down into the wash and committing himself to the front side play before the RB gets to the LOS, the RB can check for that over committal and cut the ball back across the gain for a nice gain on the backside.
While not the same, the trap play works in a similar way. Rather than sealing the defense on the backside, it seals them on the front side once they get over aggressive.
This works to pull LBs out of their run fits and out of their underneath zones. It's also highly effective at forcing safeties that are involved in run fits to cheat down or lose their spot on the field. Harbaugh has consistently taken advantage of teams that try to heavily utilize safeties within their run fits in this way.
And here's a great example of the pulling guard freezing the safety and allowing the WR to get behind him (wait for the replay).
Pull a Guard - Boot
Or, of course, you can always run boot action. This play is a designed QB keeper all the way. The Michigan defense is overloading the front, so they still have a free hitter, but he takes a poor angle because he is anticipating crashing on the RB from the backside of the play. More importantly, look what it does to the ILB that would be the backside ILB against power.
Conclusions
Michigan is going to pull blockers, it's a key facet of their offense. They love to get additional bodies at the point of attack. But defenses are going to use those pulls as keys to get extra defenders to the point of attack as well. They key is to find the balance so that the defense must play honest. By having these counters to your standard pulls (Power, Counter, Trap), you force the defense to hesitate a bit and respect the backside run or the play action. In a downhill, power run scheme, that can make a huge difference in allowing for success.
In this post we will look at some of the standard route concepts run from a twins alignment. Obviously, these can be paired with other routes (some I'll show including a RB), but this is to get the fundamental understanding of the routes. I'll try to explain the concept briefly, as well as provide names for what you'll hear the concept called elsewhere at times (these things get lots of names, some people use the same names but have different meanings too, so it can get confusing). If a number is visible near the end of a route, that is the nominal yardage the route will be run to. For more information on specific routes, we took a look at the route tree earlier . In this article I will not discuss routes that utilize rub concepts close to the LOS (such as a switch concept). I will have a later article dedicated to rub routes from a Twins set. Many of these are similar to the TE-Flanker Concepts discussed earlier.
The defense du jour against modern spread attacks is what is commonly known as the “Tite” front. Over the past couple years, you’ve seen Big 12 teams run it increasingly often, and SEC and other teams start to incorporate variants of the look more often as well as they begin to deal with an increasing number of spread formations. But what exactly is the “Tite” front? Like any front, say, a 4-3 Under, it isn’t necessarily any one thing. You can have single-high, two-high, or even three-high safeties. You can attach your overhangs differently. And with Tite, it may even mean different box numbers. And of course, there are multiple techniques that can be employed along the way. This post is a primer to the Tite front. At the end, I’ll link some of the better articles that get into greater depth for those interested, but for now, we need to understand the basics, so that we can understand how to attack it.
We are going to continue our look at various passing concepts, this time with 2x2 and mirrored passing concepts. In this post we are going to trim out the concepts that are designed to attack the middle of the field and put those into a separate post. 2x2 concepts allow an offense to attack a defense based on post-snap looks and coverages via a simple read of the safety. Completely mirrored concepts, when the same concept is run on the both sides of the formation (such as all-hitches), is something of which I'm not a huge fan, but there are advantages to it. You look at something like all-hitches, which overloads underneath zones, and you see a viable option in the short passing game against zone heavy teams; similarly, completely mirrored concepts can allow you to pick on certain defenders or to a certain side of the field based on defensive look. We'll also look at "base" concepts, which see the outside receivers run the same route, and a third receiver work the mid
Just finding your site, excellent article. Makes watching this type of offense more entertaining, seeing these tactics.
ReplyDelete