History and Evolution: Power O - Bonus - "Power" within the Zone Architecture

By -

 It always bugged me when at Michigan, Rich Rod would call his Lead Outside Zone play "Power". Football terminology is notoriously inconsistent from program-to-program, where the same word can mean very different things. But Power had established a sort of agreement and consistency, it is down blocks on the frontside with a backside puller, a true gap/man scheme. Yet here was Rich Rod calling Outside Zone "Power." It made my head hurt for a long time, until one day I was looking through the Joe Gibbs's playbook, and the rationale behind it struck me. 

As I noted in the History and Evolution Series, power itself was originally focused on the Power Sweep, as a sort of variant to the inside run and option series. As Option Teams (often Wing T types) moved more toward zone blocking in the 70s, Power had to be adapted in ways to fit what they did. Rarely did these teams pull within the formation, it was mostly zone blocking, occasional traps as a change up, and maybe a lead pull around the edge.

So thinking within the sense of not pulling blockers (even around the edge), you ask how you can still get outside the formation. The answer becomes outside zone blocking with a lead back trying to open up the alley. And you get this, from Joe Gibbs's playbook (which also contained traditional Power O by then).


Now, the idea behind it and how it converges with more traditional power isn't too difficult to understand. When you think of traditional Power, you think of a kickout block, a puller from the backside, and frontside combo blocks to the backside of the play.

The easiest way to picture this Gibbs's "Power" is to think of Inside Zone first, specifically, Lead Inside Zone. On Lead Inside Zone, your FB is responsible for the front side LB, the same player the backside puller targets in traditional Power O. As your FB is responsible for the front side LB, the zone combos, which are typically vertical in nature, now work back one person at the 2nd level. In other words, the frontside combos now work back at the second level.

So your traditional zone looks like this (here with a split block from the FB):



And becomes something more like this:


And what it effectively looks like is single back Power O, where the FB replaces the backside puller. 

Now remember, for the zone teams, what they were really working into their playbook was the Power Sweep, but it's not all together different in concept, except the blocking up front is Outside Zone blocking. This essentially means instead of the combos working further playside, they'll be more vertical in Lead Outside Zone, but the idea is the same, the aiming point is one player back as the FB accounts for the playside LB as a lead blocker (taking the role that the backside Guard traditionally plays as a lead blocker in Power O).

And that is how Rich Rod and Joe Gibbs came about "Power" as an outside zone play and it looked like this (here with a fake split flow in the backfield).

Here it is with multiple backs near the goal line


 

And protected by an early version of a same side pop pass in the slot (note: the outside WR runs a hitch route that is used if playside DBs are dropping off to handle the inside verticals)


Note: Both retained traditional Power O within their offenses, but at least in the case of Rich Rod, was not favored compared to zone blocking.


History and Evolution - Power

Part I - The Power Series Origins

Part II - Off Tackle Power Earns the Name Power

Part III - The Modern Era of Power Diversity

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Football Fundamentals: Twins Passing Concepts

By -
Image
In this post we will look at some of the standard route concepts run from a twins alignment. Obviously, these can be paired with other routes (some I'll show including a RB), but this is to get the fundamental understanding of the routes. I'll try to explain the concept briefly, as well as provide names for what you'll hear the concept called elsewhere at times (these things get lots of names, some people use the same names but have different meanings too, so it can get confusing). If a number is visible near the end of a route, that is the nominal yardage the route will be run to. For more information on specific routes, we took a look at the  route tree earlier . In this article I will not discuss routes that utilize rub concepts close to the LOS (such as a switch concept). I will have a later article dedicated to rub routes from a Twins set. Many of these are similar to the TE-Flanker Concepts discussed earlier.
Read more

Football Fundamentals: The Tite Front Defense

By -
Image
The defense du jour against modern spread attacks is what is commonly known as the “Tite” front. Over the past couple years, you’ve seen Big 12 teams run it increasingly often, and SEC and other teams start to incorporate variants of the look more often as well as they begin to deal with an increasing number of spread formations. But what exactly is the “Tite” front? Like any front, say, a 4-3 Under, it isn’t necessarily any one thing. You can have single-high, two-high, or even three-high safeties. You can attach your overhangs differently. And with Tite, it may even mean different box numbers. And of course, there are multiple techniques that can be employed along the way. This post is a primer to the Tite front. At the end, I’ll link some of the better articles that get into greater depth for those interested, but for now, we need to understand the basics, so that we can understand how to attack it.
Read more

Football Fundamentals: 2x2 and Mirrored Passing Concepts

By -
Image
We are going to continue our look at various passing concepts, this time with 2x2 and mirrored passing concepts. In this post we are going to trim out the concepts that are designed to attack the middle of the field and put those into a separate post. 2x2 concepts allow an offense to attack a defense based on post-snap looks and coverages via a simple read of the safety. Completely mirrored concepts, when the same concept is run on the both sides of the formation (such as all-hitches), is something of which I'm not a huge fan, but there are advantages to it. You look at something like all-hitches, which overloads underneath zones, and you see a viable option in the short passing game against zone heavy teams; similarly, completely mirrored concepts can allow you to pick on certain defenders or to a certain side of the field based on defensive look. We'll also look at "base" concepts, which see the outside receivers run the same route, and a third receiver work the mid
Read more