Inside the Playbook - A Look at MSU's Unique Cover 3 Package Part 2

By -
Introduction
Last time I showed how MSU played a cover 3 look on 3rd and long against ND. This time, we'll look at how they can give that same look, still play cover 3, but manage to confuse the offense nonetheless.

 The Set Up
Just a reminder of the set-up: it's third and long and here is the defensive formation.



Same Coverage, Different Look
This is something that MSU didn't run, but may in the future. The initial look is the same and it will still be a cover 3. However, now MSU will only bring 5 man pressure and will adjust the coverage behind the play to take away any routes.


Now MSU has built in the adjustment to any route concepts into their coverage. Both defenders are playing soft near the first down marker. If the #2 receiver decides to attack the seam on a vertical route, the seam defender will check #1 and have time to determine if he needs to carry the #2 deep or break off to his sideline curl/hook underneath zone. This allows, theoretically, for the defense to maintain 5 deep defenders.

Meanwhile, if one of the receivers doesn't run a vertical route, then the coverage will become a typical cover 3 as soon as one of them breaks or the QB's eyes take the underneath defenders to the play (essentially, the backside zone will be vacated in this concept).

Alright, so let’s look specifically how this coverage will adjust to different schemes.

4 Verticals

#2 breaking Short

 #1 Breaking Short
Same Coverage, Different Look: Part 2
Obviously, the weakness of the last concept is the seam defender  holding the vertical route from the #2 and breaking on the #1 hitch, so now MSU can invert their deep third defenders and allow the outside CBs to make the read adjustment. The worry here is that the QB will fit a quick pass into the seam, so to adjust, MSU will give the initial pressure look, but will back off their OLBs. The perceived pressure from the OL is 6, but MSU actually only brings 4.



Conclusion
With slight adjustments to the look, you can run a safe cover 3 look with varying pressures and confuse the QB, offensive line, and WRs. By having these three variants in your back pocket, you can ensure that you are not giving up the big play, and force the offense not only to work for first downs, but be careful that they aren't falling into a trap placed by Pat Narduzzi.

Comments

  1. tjOctober 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM

    Well written and insightful.

    The assumption can probably be made that a decent coach would identify this as well, correct? So how much of game planning for MSU is spent on current defensive packages versus potential?

    Conversely, if Duzzi knows this is the logical next step, would he preemptively alter it to stay one step ahead?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Space CoyoteOctober 2, 2013 at 4:58 PM

    One thing that MSU has to its advantage to a degree, is the fact that they lean so heavily on cover 4 in early downs and situations. That gives them room to add to the playbook in other spots.

    Now, as far as if these are always in the playbook or not, I'm not sure. MSU will likely have a core set of plays that they bring into every game, then they'll have a set of plays that are new, whether it's to mix it up, or it's specifically schemed for the opponent, or whatever. It's difficult to say what portion of the playbook this would be a part of.

    But, if I had to guess, I would assume something like these would be in base playbook that Narduzzi goes to on third down. The nice thing about this set of plays is that really not a whole lot changes for the defense. In the end, it's cover 3 across the back and really the underneath defenders aren't doing a whole lot different than they normally would in cover 3, it's just presented differently to the other team. If this play would have been successful against ND, it wouldn't be far fetched, say if ND came out in the same personnel package, for Narduzzi to make one of these calls instead of the one seen in Part 1, because it has similar advantages, and the OL will know a 6 man pass rush is an option, but now you can mix it up a bit. But it all depends on what the DC is seeing from the opposing team and if they feel comfortable running different defenses.

    So, to actually answer your questions, I think the majority of plays are in the current package, then they probably have 10-15 other plays that they could possibly run that will be installed during the week (some of these plays will be as simple as variations and things of that nature). I think this step is a preemptive move if Narduzzi goes there, because it's just adding to the things that the offense sees. It's not like running Power O and then play action off Power O, they each work in their own right, so maybe "preemptive" isn't the best word, but that's the basic idea.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Football Fundamentals: Twins Passing Concepts

By -
Image
In this post we will look at some of the standard route concepts run from a twins alignment. Obviously, these can be paired with other routes (some I'll show including a RB), but this is to get the fundamental understanding of the routes. I'll try to explain the concept briefly, as well as provide names for what you'll hear the concept called elsewhere at times (these things get lots of names, some people use the same names but have different meanings too, so it can get confusing). If a number is visible near the end of a route, that is the nominal yardage the route will be run to. For more information on specific routes, we took a look at the  route tree earlier . In this article I will not discuss routes that utilize rub concepts close to the LOS (such as a switch concept). I will have a later article dedicated to rub routes from a Twins set. Many of these are similar to the TE-Flanker Concepts discussed earlier.
Read more

Football Fundamentals: The Tite Front Defense

By -
Image
The defense du jour against modern spread attacks is what is commonly known as the “Tite” front. Over the past couple years, you’ve seen Big 12 teams run it increasingly often, and SEC and other teams start to incorporate variants of the look more often as well as they begin to deal with an increasing number of spread formations. But what exactly is the “Tite” front? Like any front, say, a 4-3 Under, it isn’t necessarily any one thing. You can have single-high, two-high, or even three-high safeties. You can attach your overhangs differently. And with Tite, it may even mean different box numbers. And of course, there are multiple techniques that can be employed along the way. This post is a primer to the Tite front. At the end, I’ll link some of the better articles that get into greater depth for those interested, but for now, we need to understand the basics, so that we can understand how to attack it.
Read more

Football Fundamentals: 2x2 and Mirrored Passing Concepts

By -
Image
We are going to continue our look at various passing concepts, this time with 2x2 and mirrored passing concepts. In this post we are going to trim out the concepts that are designed to attack the middle of the field and put those into a separate post. 2x2 concepts allow an offense to attack a defense based on post-snap looks and coverages via a simple read of the safety. Completely mirrored concepts, when the same concept is run on the both sides of the formation (such as all-hitches), is something of which I'm not a huge fan, but there are advantages to it. You look at something like all-hitches, which overloads underneath zones, and you see a viable option in the short passing game against zone heavy teams; similarly, completely mirrored concepts can allow you to pick on certain defenders or to a certain side of the field based on defensive look. We'll also look at "base" concepts, which see the outside receivers run the same route, and a third receiver work the mid...
Read more