Coaching Points: Minnesota vs EIU, 2014

By -
Jesse Johnson - USA Today Sports
Offense
Pro-style pistol sets. Mostly inside zone and power O, some QB read plays. Mostly short and intermediate throws to the sideline. When attacking deep, it was off of PA.

Defense
Cover 1 base from an over front. Appeared to mix 4-3 personnel and nickel personnel. Switched up to Cover 3 at times, struggled a bit with coverage being a bit softer.





 Cobb
I'm going to start this off with the obvious, Cobb is a hell of a player, to the point that I think he's the most underrated RB in the B1G. He's basically Carlos Hyde Lite. He has decent speed, good vision, squares his shoulder pads and punishes tacklers, and actually has really good feet. Minnesota seemed to favor Williams in some short yardage situations. Maybe he's not back all the way yet, but I wouldn't pull Cobb in those situations either. In a conference that is deep at RB, I think Cobb is as good as any RB not named Gordon or Abdullah.

Edwards
Berkely Edwards Jr showed some of the quicks and speed he was known for coming out of high school and in his Redshirt season. He clearly has some ability to work in space. Last year, Minnesota was almost strictly between the tackles with their QB and RB runs, instead utilizing the WRs on some screens and most prominently jet sweeps to threaten the edge. I see Edwards continuing to work in that role going forward, as mostly a slot screen guy and a jet sweep guy. But he needs to continue to improve as a receiver if he wants to be used regularly, as against better competition he won't simply be able to outrun the defense.

Leidner
Any Gopher fan hoping Leidner would make a jump this off season had to be disappointed with his performance. If it wasn't a one game blip, the Minnesota offense will bog down at times as teams stack the box. Not only did Leidner look very shaky throwing down field (the few times he was asked to), but his footwork on short passes was sloppy, leading to inaccuracy on throws that need to let receivers catch and run. This isn't an offense that attacks downfield often, so it needs to be able to stretch the field horizontally from pro sets to stretch the defense a bit, which requires Leidner confidently hit on hitches, outs, and screen throws. And then he needs to be able to give his receivers a chance when they do eventually attack deep.

Defense
I thought the DL, for the most part, held up and did their job pretty well. They weren't outstanding in the pass rush, though they eventually got three sacks, but a lot of that was the EIU QB being a pretty good threat to run the ball and Minnesota playing it a bit safe. Overall, they seemed solid in holding up out of their over front and keeping their LBs clean.

However, I was not particularly enthralled by their LB play. Missing on several assignments (an option bust where the LB left the QB) or missed reads (not reading the counter pulls from the OL) left them out of position at several times. They continue to not get great drops in zone and just overall didn't look very disciplined. For a team that will be consistent up front and solid in their Cover 1 on the back, the LBs need to improve for the defense to take a jump from last year. Now, it's hard to say sometimes when you play lesser competition. It was the first game, Minnesota could impose their will a little bit at times. So maybe it was the nerves and excitement that caused some mistakes, but it needs to be better.

Besides that, Minnesota mostly looked solid in the Cover 1, showing much of the fundamentals and adjustments I discussed recently about the coverage. But they still looked too soft in their zone coverages, particularly in the intermediate area, where digs and posts may threaten this team in pass protection. That needs to be cleaned up for when they play teams that have some better athletes and going Cover 1 isn't always the best option.

Conclusion
This was a game that Minnesota knew they could mostly win up front when they needed to. Running the ball, Cobb looked solid and Leidner could have threatened a bit more if needed. This is a solid run game that can mix in some Power O and zone and open some holes a bit for the run game. They aren't spectacular, but they are a good, strong unit. But they need to develop the rest of the game at least enough to keep defenses honest, that wasn't seen against EIU.

On defense, there were some inconsistencies that would have hurt them against a better foe. EIU did enough to shoot themselves in the foot numerous times with unforced errors, and missed some open players. They seemed to work the ball decently, ending with over 400 yards, but Minnesota held up when they needed. They have to clean up some zone coverage and be better at the LB level or B1G teams will find a way to pick on those aspects of the game.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Football Fundamentals: Twins Passing Concepts

By -
Image
In this post we will look at some of the standard route concepts run from a twins alignment. Obviously, these can be paired with other routes (some I'll show including a RB), but this is to get the fundamental understanding of the routes. I'll try to explain the concept briefly, as well as provide names for what you'll hear the concept called elsewhere at times (these things get lots of names, some people use the same names but have different meanings too, so it can get confusing). If a number is visible near the end of a route, that is the nominal yardage the route will be run to. For more information on specific routes, we took a look at the  route tree earlier . In this article I will not discuss routes that utilize rub concepts close to the LOS (such as a switch concept). I will have a later article dedicated to rub routes from a Twins set. Many of these are similar to the TE-Flanker Concepts discussed earlier.
Read more

Football Fundamentals: 2x2 and Mirrored Passing Concepts

By -
Image
We are going to continue our look at various passing concepts, this time with 2x2 and mirrored passing concepts. In this post we are going to trim out the concepts that are designed to attack the middle of the field and put those into a separate post. 2x2 concepts allow an offense to attack a defense based on post-snap looks and coverages via a simple read of the safety. Completely mirrored concepts, when the same concept is run on the both sides of the formation (such as all-hitches), is something of which I'm not a huge fan, but there are advantages to it. You look at something like all-hitches, which overloads underneath zones, and you see a viable option in the short passing game against zone heavy teams; similarly, completely mirrored concepts can allow you to pick on certain defenders or to a certain side of the field based on defensive look. We'll also look at "base" concepts, which see the outside receivers run the same route, and a third receiver work the mid
Read more

Football Fundamentals: The Tite Front Defense

By -
Image
The defense du jour against modern spread attacks is what is commonly known as the “Tite” front. Over the past couple years, you’ve seen Big 12 teams run it increasingly often, and SEC and other teams start to incorporate variants of the look more often as well as they begin to deal with an increasing number of spread formations. But what exactly is the “Tite” front? Like any front, say, a 4-3 Under, it isn’t necessarily any one thing. You can have single-high, two-high, or even three-high safeties. You can attach your overhangs differently. And with Tite, it may even mean different box numbers. And of course, there are multiple techniques that can be employed along the way. This post is a primer to the Tite front. At the end, I’ll link some of the better articles that get into greater depth for those interested, but for now, we need to understand the basics, so that we can understand how to attack it.
Read more